Chart of Name Changes

[Oofis]

Wait he only had Breaking Free for 2 weeks??? I remember it as being way longer but ok

[New Kieferton]

I'm not adding them as they were clearly done in the hours I was in bed so if they lasted that long chances are not enough people were about to remember them as it. The purpose of the chart is to show a full history so you know who's who if you've been gone a while. If it's a name for five minutes, no one bats an eye lid.

[New Kieferton]

I've updated as best as I can the inactive users/active users lists. My criteria was if they've been online in the last month and they're on the main list,,they stay online. But if they're on the inactive list and haven't been online this year, in not putting them in.

[LightningStrike]

English Dinner Tea

[Colts]

dbl post but unfortunately they do count to the list, should they be serious or not AND if they were just for 5 minutes.

I agree because what if people missed it? They can check this chart to find out what happened.

[DeluxePizza]

Let me just remind everyone of the criteria we had ALL this time with the previous Chart of Name Changes:

Legend
> This means the username was changed to the one next to it.
>> This means the username was changed to the next one after a few hours or days.
= This means the user deleted their account but came back with a different name.

Technically, if they were changed for a few hours at least, then yes, we can add it in. However, the name changes last night were there just for a few minutes at most. All we're going to be doing by adding every single name change that was done for a minute is creating unnecessary long lists that will lower the amount of characters in each post quicker.

Also, this isn't pulled from this topic. This was pulled from Soup Mia's version of the Chart of Name Changes topic; click on the "Quote from: Soup Mia..."

Also, sorry Kiefer but at this point, I'm adding the format from the other versions to this topic as there was no issue in the past with this format.

[Colts]

Let me just remind everyone of the criteria we had ALL this time with the previous Chart of Name Changes:Technically, if they were changed for a few hours at least, then yes, we can add it in. However, the name changes last night were there just for a few minutes at most. All we're going to be doing by adding every single name change that was done for a minute is creating unnecessary long lists that will lower the amount of characters in each post quicker.

Also, this isn't pulled from this topic. This was pulled from Soup Mia's version of the Chart of Name Changes topic; click on the "Quote from: Soup Mia..."

Also, sorry Kiefer but at this point, I'm adding the format from the other versions to this topic as there was no issue in the past with this format.

Thank you! I have been asking for this for so long now!

[LightningStrike]

Should I change my name this month or next month?

[Katakuri]

Should I change my name this month or next month?

You should do it now

[LightningStrike]

You should do it now

You seem to be looking forward to my being mercury, even more than me.

[Katakuri]

Naw I just like fresh new names tbh. That's why I change mine ASAP :p

[New Kieferton]

Thank you! I have been asking for this for so long now!

asking for what?

[Katakuri]

asking for what?

Adding the old legend back (See Danny's post that soup quoted on that message)

[DeluxePizza]

asking for what?

The information the other versions had, which is now on the first post here.

[New Kieferton]

thanks for that?? You could've at least updated the names of past owners like I did...